Tuesday, November 19, 2013

The former VAT legislation did not make specific mention of IP transactions, which possibly led to the assumption that VAT was not chargeable. Further, as far as the author is aware, there were no claims by the tax authority for VAT to be imposed on these transactions, leading to the assumption that they were not taxable supplies for VAT purposes.

Under the current VAT law, in the context of a trademark assignment, for example, VAT is chargeable at 16% regardless of whether or not the assignor has a place of business in Kenya. The taxable value of the assignment on which VAT is charged is:

  • the consideration for the supply; or
  • if the supplier and recipient are related, the open market value of the supply.

Where the assignor has a place of business in Kenya, it is the assignor’s duty to remit the VAT charged to the taxing authority. Where the assignor does not have a place of business in Kenya and the assignment is to an unregistered person (invariably a consumer or a foreign-based business), VAT is due from the assignor, which is required to have a representative based in Kenya for the purposes of remitting VAT. Where the assignor does not have a place of business in Kenya and the assignee is a registered person (invariably a Kenya-based business), the assignment will be treated as an imported taxable service and VAT on the assignment will be due from the assignee.

There are, as yet, no regulations or directions from the tax authority in respect of collection and remittance of VAT on IP transactions. However, it is expected that there will be closer monitoring and sharing of information between the IP offices and the tax authorities for the purposes of enforcing the requirement to pay VAT on these transactions.

John Syekei and Judy Chebet, Coulson Harney Advocates, Nairobi

"This article first appeared on WTR Daily, part of World Trademark Review, in (month/year). For further information, please go to"