Skip to content

High Court confirms non-enforceability of lump sum future maintenance orders against retirement funds

7 July 2015
– 1 Minute Read
July 7
Download PDF

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE

High Court confirms non-enforceability of lump sum future maintenance orders against retirement funds

7 July 2015
- 1 Minute Read

July 7

Download PDF

DOWNLOAD ARTICLE

Home > Insights

On 1 July 2015 the Bowman Gilfillan Pensions Law Team obtained a high court order in the matter of Sentinel Retirement Fund v Mtambo and Others (Case No 75404/2013). The case dealt with the validity of a maintenance order that required future maintenance to be deducted by a retirement fund from a member’s lump sum benefit.

Never miss a story

Stay updated about Bowmans news as it happens

Subscribe

Most Popular Insights

  1. Kenya: Anti-counterfeit laws – A comprehensive guide to protecting Intellectual Property and ensuring compliance – By John Syekei, Daniel Mwathe, Richard Odongo, Tuesday September 17, 2024
  2. South Africa: The thin line between being a bad manager and a bully in the workplace – By Sibusiso Dube, Monday September 16, 2024
  3. South Africa: LAC confirms that conciliation is a necessary step when challenging the substantive fairness of retrenchments post-facilitation – By Chloë Loubser, Monday September 16, 2024

YOU ALSO MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN

Kenya: Anti-counterfeit laws – A comprehensive guide to protecting Intellectual Property and ensuring compliance

17 September 2024 – The challenge of combating counterfeit goods remains prevalent in several African countries, and it affects various sectors, including pharmaceuticals, ICT, agriculture, logistics, chemicals and automotives to fast-moving …
BY John Syekei, Daniel Mwathe and Richard Odongo

South Africa: The thin line between being a bad manager and a bully in the workplace

16 September 2024 – At what point does such conduct cross the line such that it is regarded as being in breach of a harassment policy?
BY Sibusiso Dube

South Africa: LAC confirms that conciliation is a necessary step when challenging the substantive fairness of retrenchments post-facilitation

16 September 2024 – A recent LAC’s decision clarifies that a referral to conciliation is necessary before challenging the substantive fairness of retrenchments.
BY Chloë Loubser